Karakter vs Persoonlikheid

Maart 11, 2008 at 7 : 26 160 Kommentaar

Ek het die volgende eendag gehoor:

Persoonlikheid = Karakter + Ervaringe

Hoe waar is dit?  Is daar ‘n verskil tussen karakter en persoonlikheid?

Ek dink karakter is waarmee jy gebore is.  M.a.w of jy iemand is wat kort van draad is of dalk iemand wat perfeksionisties is.  Dit wat geen pak slae of ander drastiese stappe uit jou kan haal nie.  Persoonlikheid is hoe die karakter aan ander oor gedra word.  Persoonlikheid kan verander, karakter kan nie. 

Tog dink ek die stelling is nie waar nie.  Ek dink ander mense se ervaringe kan ook ‘n invloed op jou persoonlikheid he.  Somstyds is erg versigtige mense juis so oor wat met ander mense gebeur het.   So kan iemand wat bang is, bang wees omdat daar iemand vermoor is – ongeag die mens die persoon ken.  Iemand kan dalk sku vir kinders wees omdat ander se kinders hulle afgesit het.

Dink julle ek is op die regte spoor hiermee?

Blogvraag vir die dag:  Wie se gevleuelde woorde is die volgende:  Jou hand is nog nie eers toegevou om ‘n oulap nie, dan dink hulle al hoe om dit uit te gee.

Gister se blogvraag – Rooi Koos was weer reg. 

Entry filed under: Uncategorized. Tags: .

Adolf Hitler Maagdelikheid

160 Kommentaar Add your own

  • 1. Adrie  |  Maart 12, 2008 om 3 : 20


    Jy raak nou nogal heel liries vandag.

  • 2. *lilly*  |  Maart 12, 2008 om 3 : 24


    En wat bedoel jy nou daarby?

  • 3. *lilly*  |  Maart 12, 2008 om 3 : 24

    Moet gaan my man is hier

    Lekker aand vir jul

  • 4. Adrie  |  Maart 12, 2008 om 3 : 34

    Love him or hate him, he sure hits the nail
    on the head with this! Bill Gates recently gave a speech at a High School
    about 11 things they did not and will not learn in school. He talks about
    how feel-good, politically correct teachings created a generation of
    kids with no concept of reality and how this concept set them up for failure
    in the real world.

    Rule 1:
    Life is not fair – get used to it!

    Rule 2 : The world won’t care about your
    self-esteem. The world will expect you to accomplish something BEFORE you
    feel good about yourself.

    Rule 3 : You will NOT make $60,000 a
    year right out of high school. You won’t be a vice-president with a car
    phone until you earn both.

    Rule 4 : If you think your teacher is
    tough, wait till you get a boss.

    Rule 5 : Flipping burgers is not beneath
    your dignity. Your Grandparents had a different word for burger flipping:
    they called it opportunity.

    Rule 6: If you mess up, it’s not your
    parents’ fault, so don’t whine about your mistakes, learn from them.

    Rule 7: Before you were born, your parents
    weren’t as boring as they are now. They got that way from paying your bills,
    cleaning your clothes and listening to you talk about how cool you thought
    you were. So before you save the rain forest from the parasites of your
    parent’s generation, try delousing the closet in your own room.

    Rule 8: Your school may have done away
    with winners and losers, but life HAS NOT. In some schools, they have abolished
    failing grades and they’ll give you as MANY TIMES as you want to get the
    right answer. This doesn’t bear the slightest resemblance to ANYTHING in
    real life.

    Rule 9: Life is not divided into semesters.
    You don’t get summers off and very few employers are interested in helping
    you FIND YOURSELF. Do that on your own time.

    Rule 10: Television is NOT real life.
    In real life people actually have to leave the coffee shop and go to jobs.

    Rule 11: Be nice to nerds. Chances are
    You’ll end up working for one.

  • 5. Adrie  |  Maart 12, 2008 om 3 : 37

    Tax Cuts in Perspective
    Let’s put tax cuts in terms everyone can understand.

    Suppose that every day, ten men go out for beer and the bill for all ten comes to R100. If they paid their bill the way we pay our taxes, it would go something like this:

    The first four men (the poorest) would pay nothing.
    The fifth would pay R1.
    The sixth would pay R3.
    The seventh would pay R7.
    The eighth would pay R12.
    The ninth would pay R18.
    The tenth man (the richest) would pay R59.

    So, that’s what they decided to do.

    The ten men drank in the bar every day and seemed quite happy with the arrangement, until one day, the owner threw them a curve. “Since you are all such good customers,” he said, “I’m going to reduce the cost of your daily beer by R20.” Drinks for the ten now cost just R80.

    The group still wanted to pay their bill the way we pay our taxes, so the first four men were unaffected. They would still drink for free. But what about the other six men, the paying customers? How would they divide the R20 windfall so that everyone would get his fair share?

    They realized that R20 divided by six is R3.33. But if they subtracted that from everybody’s share, then the fifth man and the sixth man would each end up being paid to drink his beer. So, the bar owner suggested that it would be fair to reduce each man’s bill by roughly the same amount, and he proceeded to work out the amounts each should pay.

    And so:

    The fifth man, like the first four, now paid nothing (100% savings).
    The sixth now paid R2 instead of R3 (33% savings).
    The seventh now pay R5 instead of R7 (28% savings).
    The eighth now paid R9 instead of R12 (25% savings).
    The ninth now paid R14 instead of R18 (22% savings).
    The tenth now paid R49 instead of R59 (16% savings).

    Each of the six was better off than before and the first four continued to drink for free. But once outside the restaurant, the men began to compare their savings.

    “I only got a Rand out of the R20, “declared the sixth man. He pointed to the tenth man, “but he got R10!”

    “Yeah, that’s right,” exclaimed the fifth man. “I only saved a Rand, too. It’s unfair that he got ten times more than I!”

    “That’s true!!” shouted the seventh man. “Why should he get R10 back when I got only two? The wealthy get all the breaks!”

    “Wait a minute,” yelled the first four men in unison. “We didn’t get anything at all. The system exploits the poor!”

    The nine men surrounded the tenth and beat him up.

    The next night the tenth man didn’t show up for drinks, so the nine sat down and had beers without him. But when it came time to pay the bill, they discovered something important. They didn’t have enough money between all of them for even half of the bill!

    And that, boys and girls, journalists and college professors, is how our tax system works. The people who pay the highest taxes get the most benefit from a tax reduction. Tax them too much, attack them for being wealthy, don’t protect them against crime like in South Africa, and they just may not show up anymore. In fact, they might start drinking overseas where the atmosphere is somewhat friendlier.
    – Author unknown –

  • 6. Adrie  |  Maart 12, 2008 om 3 : 40

    Ek is seker stupid, maar dit lyk vir my of die rykste een, die kleinste besparing gemaak het.

  • 7. Rooi Koos  |  Maart 12, 2008 om 4 : 00

    Persentasies kan n totale wanpersepsie skep. Ongelukkig werk die kapitaal stelsel so dat die rykes moet vir die armis betaal anders gaan hulle van die rykes ontslae raak. Jy sien met n stem tel die ryk ou se stem net so veel soos die arm ou sin. So om die arm ou an die ryk ou se wil te onderwerp moet die ryk ou hom paai en seker te maak die sisteem werk nog. So as jy dink die rykes moet nie vir die arm mense sorg nie word dan komunisties dan is almal ewe arm.

  • 8. Adrie  |  Maart 12, 2008 om 4 : 02


    Dit is waar, maar die drolle in die stuk het net gesien wat die ryker een op die einde van die dag in sy sak steek. Nie wat hy eindlik bespaar het nie.

  • 9. Rooi Koos  |  Maart 12, 2008 om 4 : 07

    Ek het geen probleem as iemand ryk is nie maar as die persoon sy geld vat en net niks daarme doen nie net versamel dan het ek n probleem. As jy gaan kyk na mense wat baie geld het en dit bele in nuwe projekte om meer vir die samelewing te doen dan is dit reg as hy nog meer maak. Maar as jy kyk na mense wat net versamel en niks weer herbele dan sal daar naderhand net een groot vis wees en die res het niks.

  • 10. Adrie  |  Maart 12, 2008 om 4 : 44


Lewer kommentaar

Verskaf jou besonderhede hieronder of klik op 'n logo om in te teken:

WordPress.com Logo

Jy lewer kommentaar met jou rekening by WordPress.com. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

Jy lewer kommentaar met jou rekening by Twitter. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

Jy lewer kommentaar met jou rekening by Facebook. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

Jy lewer kommentaar met jou rekening by Google+. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed

Rosies vir Little Angels

The ARK; Standard bank; Hermanus ReK no: 085133698; Takkode: 050312


website counter

Liedjie Doring Augustus – Max

Liedjiedorings September

Willes: 100

Olga: 13

Max: 37.5

Wip: 8

Kaneels: 2





Gevreetjie Fabriek



Dorings en Soms Rose het 'n groep op Facebook gestig. Soek ons gerus op.

Hoe vaar ons?

ZA TOP Sites

%d bloggers like this: